Title
Join Our Community
Industry-leading Internet Gateway Protection

Blog

David Finger, Product Marketing Manger, Trend Micro: Monday, February 4, 2008 | 9:00 AM
 
In 2007, there were many articles discussing the changing role of IT-a notable shift from maintaining IT infrastructure to contributing to business growth. IT BusnessEdge.com published one by Denis McCauley with the Economist Business Intelligence Unit, and InformationWeek published another.
 
What I find so interesting is that when Osterman Research conducted its survey on Mail Server Security TCO they found that that some mail server security solutions are costing organizations twice as much as others, and yet those who are expending more resources don't seem to mind. More than one-half of respondents for each vendor reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the level of ongoing administration. Is this a case of ignorance is bliss?
 
The reality is that Trend Micro ScanMail customers reported day-to-day administration required 624 hours per year compared to 1196 hours per year according to Symantec customers and 1430 hours per year reported by those using Microsoft. So how can Symantec and Microsoft customers be satisfied with that? And keep in mind, we're at a time when more than half of all CIOs polled are citing the burden of ongoing IT maintenance.
 
Source: InformationWeek. "Defining the CIO." 2007.
Challenges:
What are the major obstacles confronting the CIO

Is there a disconnect between these CIOs and their IT administrators? Have organizations simply accepted their routines related to mail server security as the norm? Is there a general cynicism that "the grass always looks greener on the other side" and all mail server security solutions are the same?

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (1)


David Perry, Global Director of Education, Trend Micro: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 | 5:00 PM
 
The very first computer virus did not happen on a Windows(TM) machine, or a Mac(TM) or an Apple(TM) II. The first virus did not travel via the Internet or in an email or in a floppy disk. The first virus was not on a minicomputer, nor was it on a mainframe. That's because the first computer virus didn't exist on any computer hardware or software of any kind.
 
It was in a work of fiction.
 
By the late 1970's, movies books and television shows had given the public a very strong impression of hackers, viruses, and other computer threats.
 
Unfortunately, these dramatic ideas have nothing at all to do with reality.
 
In the movies, viruses destroy computer hardware, sometimes leaving a trail of smoke and fire. In reality, no virus was ever known to damage any computer hardware. Ever.
 
In the movies, a virus or worm always has an immediate and dramatic visual effect. There is always an animated screen (HACKERS) or a warning message (SNEAKERS) or you can actually see the data being destroyed before your very eyes (THE NET). In reality most malware leaves no visible trace of its existence.
 
On the big screen, malware is used to open bank vault doors, to tip over an oil tanker, to blow up a power plant or even to crash an alien spacecraft. In reality, the most insidious virus ever would locate a spread sheet and randomly change one number.
 
Computer geeks (like me) get a real laugh out of movies about hacking and cybercrime. When a 'hacker movie' opens you will find theaters in Silicon Valley or other computer tech havens full of people laughing at all the wrong things, and at all the things gotten wrong. To our amusement and dismay, these overblown, crazy overdramatic portrayals of hacking and cybercrime are what sets the public's understanding of all things cyber. People believe in the world described by these movies. It frequently makes them less safe behind the keyboard.
 
So I was very interested in an ad for a movie called UNTRACEABLE. It portrayed a criminal website and the FBI effort to bring it down. I got ready to watch another travesty of technical misrepresentation, and talked my boss into letting me watch the very first screening.
 
And I was wrong. They got every single technical detail right. When they talk about spoofing, or ip addresses, or keyloggers, they get it exactly right. Now all of those old school movies did research; (one of them sent the screenwriter to talk to me personally, some years ago) and still got it wrong. They couldn't let go of the idea that in a visual medium, the computers needed to respond with something visual. They couldn't get over the fact that fighting computer crime is primarily done at a computer keyboard, staring at long columns of numbers.
 
But not UNTRACEABLE; they got it all right. The web page was only used for a limited period of time, and was proxied and mirrored and botnettedall over the place--standard operation in cybercrime. The social engineering used to get a backdoor into the FBI agent's home wifi network was right out of the real world. None of the computer screens at the FBI headquarters had magic graphics to show where the website was hosted. All in all, very, very believable--well done to the screenwriters and researchers involved.
 
Just one little problem. The movie was about horror porn online, and a serial killer with a need to invent ever-escalating and absurdly disgusting ways to kill people, while feeding video to a growing Internet spectator crowd. Now I know there is a long tradition of graphic violence in drama (Oedipus Rex, anyone? Romeo and Juliet?), but the modern craft is so convincing that a Grand Guignol fest like this was too much for me. I covered my eyes, I went for a diet soda, coming back to watch the plot. Diane Lane was actually quite good, as was the rest of the cast, and the procedural/plotting of the mystery and denouement were clever and inventive---but the movie has a LOT of problems, and is too preachy. It got a Rotten Tomato score of 14 (out of 100). Notably, Roger Ebert liked it a lot, and pretty much everyone else did not. Several reviewers refused to even see it.
 
So we have a movie that is finally getting the tech right (thanks again, guys) and pretty much nobody will see it. Not on my recommendation, anyway.
 
I leave with the hope that more movies get the tech right, (help is offered if anyone is interested) and the prayer that nothing like this movie ever happens this side of the projector.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


Jamz Yaneza, Research Project Manager, Trend Micro Advance Threat Research: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 | 3:45 PM
 
The past two decades have drastically changed the ways in which we use technology, particularly what it means to be online. For many years there has been a pervasive belief that the proverbial cyber "wild, wild, west" afforded users all the anonymity and privacy needed. This belief, coupled with the notion that the physical machine is in fact a trusted appliance, is one of the reasons computing in the home and office has been easily accepted.
 
As a multi-functioning device computers are no stranger to documents, images, and other things of personal interest that users store. The development of rich media content and the onset of high speed broadband connections to deliver it, has spurred the sharing of user-generated content via social networking, blog sites, and personal web pages.
 
The thing about being online is that many underlying technologies are always in play. What users see on screen is actually a graphical representation of thousands of computations and various network protocols working together to provide the online experience. As users surf the Net their browser sends identifying data to servers that by default declares the type of browser and version, its operating system and version, as well as the originating IP address. The same handshake process also happens when downloading or sharing files, even when sending out emails as these have what are called message headers that dictate how messages are routed to the correct recipient. All of these processes leave a trail of cyber bread-crumbs of information that are often used by technicians to trouble-shoot a problem. Unfortunately, this trail can likewise be followed by cyber-stalkers.
 
Privacy doesn't fare well either in this age of social networking. I personally think that the genie has been let out of the bottle when people's automatic response to meeting someone new in the real world is to use a search engine to find out something to latch onto as a trust identifier. Once you publish personally identifiable information such as pictures, voice recordings, and videos (and for some even their home addresses and phone numbers) then you've just given up your privacy. Some people are okay with this, that is, until the bad guys start to misuse the information to masquerade their criminal forays. Yes, this reckless treatment of privacy has welcomed the age of identity theft.
 
One could ask the question, if there is no privacy to be had then can't we use the same process to identify the crooks online and bring them to justice? The quick answer would be, "Yes," but the process isn't as easy. As already mentioned the bad guys have been busy and the plethora of amassed stolen identities by itself gives them an added layer of protection as fronts for malicious activity. When law enforcement tries to take them down, the trail may well lead to your doorstep, not the bad guy's. Law enforcement is improving its efforts to combat cybercrime. They are joining security groups and taking other steps to glean more experience and up-to-date information on the state of Internet security.
 
What does this mean for users in the meantime?
  1. Almost everything done in the real world is likewise done online these days; treat being online with the same caution;
  2. Use security software that includes antispam and data leak functionality; stop the bad guys before their phishing email even reaches your desktop and ensure your private information isn't being sent to unknown third-parties;
  3. Viruses, worms, Trojan horses and many other threats have grown more than ten-fold in the last year alone; install and keep your anti-malware software updated and use it as another layer of defense;
  4. Online identity theft is rampant for banking, online gaming, and social networking sites; always visit sites via their official URL and not from links sent via email, on the web, or instant messengers;
  5. Control the amount of personal information that you make public; most social networks and rich media have options to control who has access to your posted content and it is there for a reason!
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


Adam Biviano, Premium Services Manager, CISSP: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 | 12:00 PM
 
Today hackers take advantage of poorly protected web servers to gain control over websites. Just wait until they discover the range of unmaintained, badly programmed scripts behind most websites - this will get ugly!
 
Imagine that you are a small company wanting a website to promote your product and communicate with customers online. You approach a web development firm for a solution and what you receive is typically a combination of graphics, HTML and scripts. The graphics and HTML give the website its look and feel, structure and static content. The scripts provide the mechanics to bring the website to life. Modern website scripts can be as simple as a form handler to capture leads, or as complex and sophisticated as a full blown application. They are executable code running on the web server. Often they reside in a web hosting account as uncompiled, or source, code which is interpreted by the web server when a viewer accesses the website.
 
Website scripts can be based on existing, sometimes open source, scripts or be custom written for the specific client. Each client receives his or her own copy of the scripts and once the site is completed, they are rarely updated. They are unmaintained, meaning that if vulnerabilities are discovered, there are no plans to plug the holes.
 
To some degree website scripts are already under fire. Automated bots are scouring the web, gathering information and looking for weaknesses in individual websites. Website owners need only examine their web statistics to see evidence of this. Even low profile sites are being visited by exotic locations which you wouldn't expect to be doing business with. Whilst it is possible your website has attracted genuine interest from a consumer in Kazakhstan, it is more likely that this hit was the result of a malicious web crawler, which I assure you, will not conform to the requests in your robots.txt or sitemap files.
 
Common exploits like "SQL Injection" are being used against poorly written web scripts to gain access to databases. Also, gone are the days where creating a "Contact Us" form prevented your site from generating spam. These forms are now examined by and populated by bots in the hope that an unsuspecting internal user will click on a link or respond to the email the bot generated.
 
Don't be surprised if you see that your website generates internal spam which looks something like this:
 
From: Website form
 
Subject: Website enquiry
 
enquiry_subject: Customer Service
 
contact_name: Candace Heath
 
company_name: Marlon Barton
 
phone_number: Patty Bridges
 
message: overdogmatically pecht unsenatorial overrealism unpalatability compassivity rectorial kjeldahlization <a href= http://www.xxxxxxxxxxx.com/ >Bethpage Community</a> http://www.xxxxxxxx.it/
 
A bot has just completed your web form and clicked "Submit"!
 
Clever huh? By the way, don't click on the links within these emails.
 
Once a website script is compromised, the attacker has access to the underlying database which may contain private information or credit card details. The website may also be used to spread malware. Access to the website may be restricted by security systems such as Trend Micro Web Reputation, otherwise website visitors run the risk of becoming infected by a Trojan.
 
To keep these problems from escalating, the industry needs to change:
  1. Website developers need to factor code maintenance into contracts with their clients and take an active stance in the security of the online services they create.
  1. Companies with web services need to understand the security implications and be prepared to have their website developed and maintained by an outfit who understands the modern threat landscape.
The web development industry is starting to feel pressure to focus on security. Financial institutions are looking to mandate that providers of web development and hosting services follow security guidelines like the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data Security Standard. Governments and other industries will no doubt follow suit with other standards.
 
Today's websites are applications and they need to be treated as such. The difference between traditional applications and web applications is that traditional applications are protected by firewalls and are kept up to date with security patches. Web applications commonly are not!
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Perry, Global Director of Education, Trend Micro: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 | 10:00 AM
 
Much of the terminology used in the world of malicious code research must sound like jargon, even more so since the arrival of a distinct and dominant criminal element in its creation, distribution and use. For the purpose of clarity, here is my best take at a fifty-thousand-foot view, with glossary and notes. Please, let me know if I have missed anything, and I will update this on a regular basis.

Introduction
In today's world of malicious software (malware) there is rarely a simple case or a simple fact. Things have gotten complicated. There are several different facets or functions to look at in almost every case. In an effort to provide a more understandable primer, I will divide the definitions into some distinct categories, each looking at the problem from a different angle, each defining a separate piece of the crimeware world - People, Delivery Methods, and Payloads.

People
  • There are several different players in the world of Internet crime, and I will name them all as they come up in the creation of this document. As always, please email me if you wish me to add anything here. I think it is vital that we distinguish the players from the malware. All too often we see a news story where a particular cyber crime is blamed on a piece of malware. You don't see a physical bank robbery blamed on the gun; so why should we be so sloppy in reporting the world of malware? These malicious programs only exist at the specific design and to the specific uses of PEOPLE, and the PEOPLE are the criminals involved.
  • HACKER: generic term, originally meaning "skilled programmer" now full of contradictory meaning, still, today used as the general term for anyone skilled beyond the constraints of normal people, especially where computer security is concerned.
  • HACKTIVIST: politically motivated hacker (popular with website defacing).
  • HAT: a term used to define the ethical status of a hacker in question.
  • BLACK HAT: evil, or at least on the dark side. Not to be confused with the Black Hat Briefings, an annual security seminar series.
  • GREY HAT: questionable.
  • WHITE HAT: ethical hacker (there are actually standards for this).
  • BLUE HAT: a consultant brought in to hack a new system prior to it's launch.
  • RED HAT: a version of Linux, not part of this discussion.
  • SPAMMER, SPAM KING: One who sends spam (always) for monetary gain (frequently) with intent to defraud.
  • SCRIPT KIDDY: a term of derision. The "script kiddy" is too unskilled to write his own malware, and uses virus creation scripts to generate them for him.
  • BOTHERDER: anyone who gathers bots under a C&C, and resells the resultant botnet to other criminals.
  • CRACKER: one who defeats copy protection or other DRM.
  • FILE SHARER: the cheapest, lowest level of cyber crime, this is people sharing copyrighted materials online. Ironically, this is the most legally prosecuted group of all our cyber criminals, due largely to the actions of industry watchdog organizations like the RIAA and MPAA.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Perry, Global Director of Education, Trend Micro: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 | 10:00 AM
 
Much of the terminology used in the world of malicious code research must sound like jargon, even more so since the arrival of a distinct and dominant criminal element in its creation, distribution and use. For the purpose of clarity, here is my best take at a fifty-thousand-foot view, with glossary and notes. In Part Two of this primer we look at Delivery Methods. (See also Part One - People; Part Three - Payloads.)

Delivery Methods
Much of the general public still refers to everything under the sun as a virus. Also, when a new piece of malware is introduced (say, a screen scraper) it is assumed to be self contained and separate from a virus. In reality, the virus is only a DELIVERY METHOD. It can carry any of a vast number of malicious PAYLOADS, and any PAYLOAD can be foisted on any number of similar or dissimilar DELIVERY METHODS. Think of this as a modular stereo system, or a big box of evil TinkertoysT.
  • VIRUS: the granddaddy of them all, and still going strong, a virus is noted for its ability to make copies of itself, or replicate. There are far more viruses today than ever before, yet they are now the smallest part of malware. (This means malware overall has grown far more rapidly than viruses in recent years.)
  • WORM: subset of virus. A worm is a virus that spreads itself to multiple systems through a connected resource or network. This contains both email viruses like Melissa and non-user involving worms like CODE RED.
  • SPAM: automatically mass-forwarded email. Today's SPAM is almost always forwarded by a BOTNET.
  • NETWORK VIRUS (NETWORK WORM): this is a virus that uses a vulnerability to spread without any user notice or interference. A good example of this is SLAMMER.
  • PHISHING: an email delivers a spurious link to a fraudulent web page. Object? Theft of password, account data or identity, are its main targets.
  • BOTNET: oddly, the BOTNET will occur in nearly every category, because it does nearly everything! Much malicious code is delivered by the ubiquitous remote control botnets.
  • TROJAN: anything disguised to encourage the user to voluntarily download or activate it. This is like the Trojan Horse from the Odyssey.
  • WEB-BASED THREATS, WEB THREATS: the most modern family of delivery is based on viewing an infected web page. Although this contains and began with phishing attacks, today WEB THREATS frequently are triggered by the mere viewing of an infected page. Most recent statistics claim that nearly ten percent of all websites are infected.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Perry, Global Director of Education, Trend Micro: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 | 10:00 AM
 
Much of the terminology used in the world of malicious code research must sound like jargon, even more so since the arrival of a distinct and dominant criminal element in its creation, distribution and use. For the purpose of clarity, here is my best take at a fifty-thousand-foot view, with glossary and notes. In Part Three of this primer we look at Payloads. (See also Part One - People; Part Two - Delivery Methods.)

Payloads
The actual dirty work is done by a PAYLOAD, and there are plenty of these, including, but not limited to the following:
  • BOT: again, we find that bots are not only a payload for viruses and worms, but are frequently downloaded by bots themselves. BOTS are updated to add new features and to evade detection.
  • DOWNLOADER: this does just as it sounds; it is a program whose sole function is to download yet other programs.
  • TROJAN: unlike the delivery method (trojan) defined in part 2, when the word TROJAN is applied as a payload it frequently means that a back door or RAT (see below) has been planted on the system.
  • BACKDOOR: An added and secret way into the targeted system.
  • TRAPDOOR: A backdoor built into the system by its designers; a trapdoor is never a payload for malware.
  • KEYLOGGER: records every keystroke in the hope of stealing vital information.
  • EVENT RECORDER: like a keylogger but records Internet input as well as keyboard data.
  • SCREEN SCRAPER: takes 'snapshots' of the computer screen to override protection from the keylogger.
  • ROOTKIT: the 'Harry Potter invisibility cloak' of the software world, a rootkit will hide anything else going on by seizing control of the program vector table.
  • SPYWARE: a much overused term, spyware can be anything from a web cookie log to a password theft payload. Many innocuous spyware infections are used by crimeware for a 'piggyback.'
  • LOGIC BOMB, DESTRUCTIVE PAYLOAD: very 'old school' a logic bomb will destroy data (or, in very limited circumstances, systems) when triggered.
  • TRIGGER CONDITION: had to put this in here, viruses, etc. used to rely on some external condition (date, time, reboot count, ad infinitum) to trigger their payload activity, but nowadays it is pretty much all handled under internet triggering and a C&C.
Schema and miscellany
There are 'scenes', 'games' and 'capers' where Internet crime is concerned. Here is a starter list.
  • IRC CHAT ROOMS: this is where much of the criminal business is done. Stolen credit cards and passwords are auctioned off by the bucketload on secret criminal auction sites. All pretty much based on Internet Relay Chat (IRC).
  • COMMAND AND CONTROL (C&C): the server that drives a BOTNET.
  • SHARED RESOURCE CONNECTION: in the recent Web threat invasions, we have seen a trend to infect via an isp, Web hosting agency or other common infrastructure server. This permits infection of thousands of websites in a very limited amount of time.
  • DISTRIBUTED MALWARE GANG: the person who writes the code is working for someone who resells it to an integrator who packages it into an 'off the shelf' toolkit like MPACK. The person who infects the system with this purchased kit resells the stolen data to yet another gang who actually arrange the crime. This passing the buck makes it very difficult to prosecute cyber criminals, especially when done internationally.
  • OFF-THE-SHELF, KITS: these days, a criminal needs no expertise to become an Internet criminal-he can buy an off-the-shelf hacking package together with tech support and an upgrade contract.
  • PHARMING: like phishing, but accomplished at the Domain Name Server (DNS) level. Pharming requires sophisticated techniques to detect.
  • DENIAL OF SERVICE ATTACK (DOS, DDOS): many computers are used to shut down a particular IP address, frequently for purposes of extortion. The first really noteworthy DDOS was in 1992, and was performed by a Toronto area teen calling himself "mafiaboy." Today, DOS attacks are very common. The machines involved are frequently referred to as 'ZOMBIES.'
  • INFECTED WEB SITE: using any one of a number of vulnerabilities, a website can become the source of an infection. It is estimated that ten percent (10%) of ALL websites are infected.
  • ZOMBIE: a machine used in a DOS or in a BOTNET (distinction--the program is a BOT-short for Robot, the computer is a ZOMBIE).
  • WAREZ: hacker term for software (particularly cracked software, malware and software piracy).
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


Ivan Macalintal, Research Project Manager, Trend Micro Advance Threat Research: Thursday, December 6, 2007 | 10:13 PM
 
Last month The Guardian ran an article on the apparent disappearance of the notorious Russian Business Network (RBN). "Hunt for Russia's Web Criminals" describes the recent game of cat and mouse being played out with the Russian ISP blamed for some 60% of Internet crime.

The RBN vanishing act reminded me of a film from December 2006 starring Edward Norton. The film was aptly called, "The Illusionist." Norton plays a magician whose mesmerizing sleight of hand leads to a faked death, a wrongful accusation, and a suspicious disappearance.

As with the magician in the movie, we've been led to believe the RBN have "vanished," when in reality they are still here conducting their usual activities. Some recent sightings indicate that they are behind some PC hijackings via ad banners on a couple of major Web sites which include the Major League!

They're attempting to divert our attention, lead us astray, conjure up illusions that point to some out-of-the-way and dubious suspicious cyber-groups, when in reality, it is RBN all along.

Web threats are serious business. We're monitoring any RBN-related events and incidents - however small - so that we will not be taken off-guard.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


Paul Oliveria, Technical Communications Specialist, TrendLabs: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 | 10:33 AM
 
The rise of Web-based threats has leveled the playing field for computer users and hackers alike. Regardless of operating system or applications used, visiting Web sites or trying to download and watch movies online is all it can take for users to get infected. Until recently, Mac users had a false sense of security and immunity to threats. This is quickly disappearing as new threats are coming to the Mac platform.

Last month, the ZLOB family of trojans crossed over from Windows to attack Mac users. These threats enter the computer disguised as video codecs apparently needed for the video to display properly. In reality, they change the DNS server of the infected computer to point to other sites and serve advertisements. The download servers of the trojan are configured to provide the Mac executable when the sites are accessed from a Mac computer. TrendLabs researchers are continuously monitoring this malware family, detecting and blocking the malicious URLs, to make sure computer users are protected from them.

Last week was riddled with attacks, real and otherwise, against Mac computers, starting with news that several Mac fan sites had been hacked and defaced because of their "excessive Apple fanboism." The incident turned out to be a publicity stunt gone awry. However, the message that came with this hoax somewhat holds true:

This is a message to the rest of the Mac community, so listen up. Ever heard of hubris? Tone it down and you will not be attacked.

Given Mac's increasing popularity, there will likely be no sign of "toning it down." And the attacks are coming left and right. Case in point: iDisk, a Mac user's version of an online personal hard disk. Recently, Trend Micro Senior Threat Researcher Feike Hacquebord came across some 200+ spam-related URLs on 23 iDisk accounts. These URLs are hosted on idisk.mac.com. The affected accounts may have been compromised, legitimate, or even trial accounts, but the fact remains that spammy URLs more often that not point to more malicious sites and files.

Is the time ripe for more Mac attacks? It's very likely. Mac users should therefore be more aware of the threats their machines are vulnerable to, as well as the steps they can take to protect themselves and their network. Trend Micro, together with Intego-the leading developer of Internet security and privacy software for Macintosh-may have the solution for you. Learn more from our white paper: Your Enterprise is Only as Secure as Your Macs.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro: Thursday, October 18, 2007 | 8:07 AM
 

Sometimes things aren't what they look like, but sometimes they are. A few months back, our investigators followed a threat taking shape from a dodgy Web server. After chasing the initial lead, they were able to pull a lot of data and track down where the attack was coming from: an organization that calls itself RBN (Russian Business Network). For some time we've noticed this specific part of the Internet spewing malware, infected Web pages, malicious exploits, and spam galore. Now more people are noticing as reported in the news, but even though many security companies have tried to report malware incidents from the RBN to the Russian authorities, this organization has proved to be as resilient as the Web hosting they allegedly aim to provide. Just yesterday, this shady organization spoke for the first time, denying all charges against them.

The fact is that where there is money to be had, there will always be people willing and able to break the law for their own benefit. From the looks of it, criminal organizations centered on malware are here to stay and their business models are developing as fast as their income. I read recently about the concept of "malware as a service" on blogspot and that's exactly what RBN and others criminals are becoming: malware enablers. Not only do they create the executables, but these organizations host and maintain a complex platform that fuels the malware engine and then sell it to their customers. They keep deploying and updating malware, while using the stolen bandwidth and data to fulfill their customer's needs.

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (1)


Miray Lozada: Monday, July 23, 2007 | 3:56 PM
 
Spammers are Excel-ing, literally. Text and image spam as PDF files are now old news as MS Excel enters the spam scene. Last July 22, Trend Micro researchers started noticing email messages that carry ZIP-packed Excel files. When opened, these Excel files stink of pump-and-dump schemes for which spam mails are now notorious.

Using ZIP as the carrier of malicious files is already a known routine of many malware families like WORM_BAGLE and TROJ_YABE. Using ZIP as carrier or as part of a spam scheme, however, is quite new and may be a social engineering tactic more than anything else. The fact that the email arrives as an Excel file packed in ZIP may have more to do with an attempt to lend credence to a stock-related email at a time when authorities are seriously running after pump-and-dump spammers. That the spammer chose Excel, an application usually associated with accounting ergo money, may not be a coincidence as well.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (1)


Christine Drake, Trend Micro: Friday, July 20, 2007 | 3:21 PM
 
Anti-spam filters have become more effective at stopping image spam, so spammers have taken this trick a step further by placing spam images in PDF files. A flood of these PDF spam started hitting the Internet in late June. TrendLabs has found that PDF spam currently comprises up to 5% of all email. Most of the recent attacks have been "pump and dump" stock scams.

In these scams, a spammer buys cheap stock and then promotes the stock in these emails. Many recipients buy the stock and drive up the value, giving the spammer a profit. This is yet another example of spam being used for cyber crime. Charges were recently filed against two men who are accused of making more than $4.6 million using a similar scam.

The recent PDF spam are sent by PCs infected with the E-card Trojan WORM_NUWAR. The higher the number of infected computers, the greater the amount of PDF spam sent. This same Trojan was responsible for sending image spam in 2006, showing that these same criminals are adapting their methods.

These new PDF spam emails tend to have randomly generated subject lines and attachment names, and often contain little to no text in the body of the email. Initially, the PDF files in these spam attacks were the same, making it easy to identify similar files within the attack. But spammers quickly began randomizing aspects of the PDF file, requiring more sophisticated detection. Spammers are also blurring the text in the image to make it more difficult for anti-spam engines to identify the spam message.

Not only does PDF spam provide a challenge to anti-spam filters by removing all content from the email body and placing it in an attachment, but these spam are also much larger than other types of spam, clogging networks and potentially delaying email.

Trend Micro quickly responded to this new type of attack by releasing anti-spam updates with heuristics targeted at PDF spam and continues to release further updates as this type of threat evolves. Trend Micro's InterScan Messaging Hosted Security is particularly effective at combating this threat because it blocks PDF spam in the cloud before entering the network, preventing this threat from impacting an organization's messaging infrastructure.

Just as image spam is on the decline, PDF spam will also fade as anti-spam engines begin to effectively block this threat. But spammers will undoubtedly come up with a new trick and the dance between spammers and anti-spam vendors will continue.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (11)


Trend Micro: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 | 3:40 PM
 
Web Threats can take a variety of different forms. Though most of them propagate through the Web, this is not a requirement. Their common trait is that they have Web communication. This means that even though they can reach the PC in any other way (email anyone?), they need the Web in order to do more devious stuff. One of the latest examples that illustrates this point is TROJ_HOTLAN.A. This trojan creates and uses webmail accounts to send spam. It retrieves the recipient list and the body message of the spammed emails from two different Web servers and sends the messages through free webmail providers like Yahoo and Hotmail. In this special case, Web reputation technology serves to stop it from being effective, even though it can't prevent the emails from being sent.
Trojans like TROJ HOTLAN.A are usually downloaded from the Web by other components so in a protected system, it would never have gotten into the system to begin with. That's the beauty of Web reputation, it thwarts the Web threat communication system so no matter how fancy they are, they'll stop being effective.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 | 7:24 AM
 
After reading news like this, Spam Campaign Surfs Web on Your Behalf, it is easy to see how dangerous spam has become. I agree that the Web is the propagation vehicle of choice for malware writers today, but often the delivery of Web threats starts by email. Today, instead of sending the malware file directly, the email includes a link to a Web site that downloads the file to the PC. This sounds similar, but it has a huge implication for security administrators: Web and email protection have to work together seamlessly. Your security system needs to protect users both from receiving the infectious email and from downloading the threat from the link.

The same thing goes for phishing site ads (spam) sent by email. Phishing emails generally use social engineering tricks to coax recipients into clicking on the link in the email, which brings the user to a phishing Web site designed to capture private information (either through malware or a form).

These examples of cross-protocol threats demonstrate how email security can be used to prevent Web threats. For example, the reputation of URLs embedded in emails can be assessed to determine if they link to spam, phishing, or malware download sites. If the embedded URL has a "bad" reputation, the email can be blocked, keeping the email out of the inbox and preventing the recipient from falling victim to the Web threat.

Trend Micro can help your company block Web threats through email by implementing an innovative way of checking the reputation of both URLs and email senders through Web Reputation and Email Reputation. In addition, Trend Micro provides Web Security which blocks access to dangerous sites. As attackers try new ways to break through our security, we can block them with an integrated defense.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Senior AV Researcher, Trend Micro: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 | 8:39 AM
 
After watching the news recently on the evolution of Web Threats, there's one single piece of data that stuck in my mind: the malware industry is now bigger than the drug-trafficking trade. The implications of this are mind-boggling for us normal people. While drug lords prey mainly on the more vulnerable layers of modern society, these cyber gangs get their income by stealing from mid-class working people. The common denominator of their victims is usually either lack of security awareness, lack of security measures, or both. If there's a lesson to be learned from this, it is that we have to be expecting an attack and not to be surprised when it comes. Because it will come, be it by email, or by the unsuspecting Web page that needs us to run "that" program. Be aware now rather than later. You can learn more about Web Threats, new infection techniques, and how to defend yourself here.
 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro: Thursday, March 22, 2007 | 4:02 PM
 

A few years ago, a friend of mine had his small retail Web site compromised by hackers. When I saw him that very same day, he told me how the "hacker group" had replaced his sausage-selling Web page with a humorous show-off page including a few distasteful remarks about how skilled the hackers were. Needless to say, my friend didn't think it was funny, but apparently that was the end of the damage.

If my friend was attacked by hackers today, chances are his customer database would be stolen along with credit card numbers and email addresses--the most valuable assets of such a database. In addition, the hackers would probably leave malware running in the machine to guarantee further access. Today, malware not only keeps the access open, but also maximizes the effects of the break in. In many cases, the compromised machines silently become malware download sites, infected with spam-sending malware or with other nasties.

Shockingly enough, it is small Internet-based businesses like my friend's that are the most likely targets of hackers. In a recent article in the New York Times, recent studies show that small businesses spend the least on security relative to larger firms. Today, I strongly advise my friend to keep his servers permanently up-to-date and protected with a comprehensive security solution. A small investment in security can prove to be a decisive barrier to attack, protecting business and customers from threats.

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Finger, Product Marketing Manger, Trend Micro: Monday, March 12, 2007 | 9:14 AM
 

Whether it is a worm (like Stration) that infects PCs in order to broadcast spam unbeknownst to the owner or a spam campaign that delivers spyware (like troj_small) to steal sensitive information, today's threats continue to grow in volume and sophistication. As a result, I am seeing many organizations expanding the traditional "defense in depth" strategy to a more intelligent and coordinated Layered Messaging Security approach- that intelligently deploys the most appropriate types of protection at the most effective points in the network.

Certainly, there has been a lot of attention focused on email gateway security in the last few years, to stop external attacks at the perimeter (in order to preserve connections and reduce bandwidth and storage costs) and, increasingly, ensure that sensitive information does not leave the organization. But protection at the email server still plays a valuable role- stopping threats originating inside of the organization (a risk that has grown along with the mobility of the workforce) by inspecting internal and outgoing email before archiving, supervisory and other obligations begin.

Beyond email, I've seen a growing awareness of the need to extend messaging security to protect IM and collaboration servers- although in many cases organizations are just beginning to move from awareness to action. And a surprising number of customers seem to be getting more value from web security products by using them to supplement messaging security measures- URL filtering is a good way to protect users against sophisticated phishing attacks, for example.

If this blog has piqued your interest, have a look at our new whitepaper on Layered Messaging Security. And please share your own opinions about what was discussed today.

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro: Monday, December 4, 2006 | 4:39 PM
 

Thanks to an increased Internet bandwidth in developed countries, video downloading is becoming a more common occurrence. In order to be able to see different video formats, users need to have codecs installed. Codecs are programs that encode and decode digital data streams.

Although the "codec installation" attack is not new, these types of attacks have been increasing lately, duping many users into downloading and installing malware threats on their PCs. The strategy of the attacker is to provide supposed codec files for users to download free of charge. They even go as far as setting up fake Web sites, created around the concept of codec downloading.

Everything starts when a user downloads a video file and is warned that a codec is needed in order to see the content. After an Internet search, users can land on a malware Web site that looks so convincingly real that they willingly install the fake codec, which is actually malware. The graphical interfaces of these fake codec Web sites are so well done that they can fool even the most experienced users. Check this screenshot and this other one for examples.

The ZLOB family of trojans is the one that uses this strategy most often. Once the malware has infected a computer, it downloads and installs more malware and eventually sets up a backdoor in the computer, leaving it vulnerable to external access. This backdoor can bring any other malware into the system with identity theft effects, information leakage, or spyware downloads. Since the final effect can be devastating for both the user and the company, it is in the user's best interest to avoid downloading codecs and other programs from untrusted sources.

Be warned, make sure you download real codecs, employ gateway security, and always have your antivirus up to date!

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro: Tuesday, November 7, 2006 | 2:07 PM
 

TrendLabs discovered the first Stration worm samples last August. Ever since then, it's been hammering users with annoying emails. The remarkable thing about Stration is that apparently it behaves like an old-time worm. It brings back memories from Bagle and Netsky and the war of the worms more than two years ago now. These worms just wanted to propagate as far and as wide as possible. To do this, they sent ingeniously-crafted emails that fool users into thinking they come from a local admin or other similar schemes. This is totally different from the threat landscape today with money-hungry malware whose only objective is steal the user's money or resources.

Well, after careful analysis by our lab researchers, Trend Micro uncovered the real reason of Stration. After some obfuscated communication with certain Internet servers, it finally downloads email templates to mass-mail to lists of users. Can you guess what kind of email it sends? Advertisements for pharmaceuticals. Yes, that's right. The whole big-worm scheme is just a giant ruse to create a massive spamming platform. If you ask me, that was something almost expected. It's not a coincidence that third-party vendors estimate spam totals between 77%, and 89% of all email traffic. Most of this is image spam, the kind of email Stration is sending.

Read the whole white paper about Stration from the Trend Micro Incident Response Team and stay protected!

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)


David Sancho, Antivirus Engineer, Trend Micro EMEA: Tuesday, November 7, 2006 | 8:49 AM
 

Right after Internet Explorer 7 was released a few days ago, some advisories appeared with new bugs that affect this last version of the ever-popular browser: check this advisory and this advisory. What does this tell us about Internet Explorer 7 browser security? Should people switch to Firefox, Opera, or any of the other browsers in the market now?

What it tells us is that Internet Explorer is still the most used and therefore the most attacked browser. Hackers continue targeting the browser that will get them the most financial gain. Lately, attacks on other browsers have increased, as well as attacks on Internet Explorer.

In my opinion, users should choose their browser taking into account product security features, usability, and speed. This is more of a personal preference rather than a matter of security policy. At the end of the day, the Web page browser is the most used tool in our everyday computing: people should use the one they are most comfortable with. That's what I do, anyway. Otherwise, we would be forced to switch browsers every time a new version is released, since that version would be the least attacked. That'd be mad, no?

 
Permalink  |  Post to Del.icio.us  |  Digg It  |  Email this post  |  Comments (0)
 
Copyright (c) 1989-2008 Trend Micro Incorporated. All rights reserved. Legal Notice | Community Guidelines | Privacy Policy | Contact Us